For many years now, CAMRA has given equal weight to campaigning for the promotion and protection of pubs and campaigning for live beer, cider and perry. We campaign to help and save pubs regardless of whether they serve cask beer or not.
We believe that pubs are vital social institutions and that this status must be recognised by decision makers nationally and locally. We also believe in maintaining a varied choice of pubs and, while those of special historic or architectural interest must be conserved, all should be celebrated for their role as institutions and for their individual character.
We pursue this by:
We pursue this by:
We pursue this by campaigning to convince decision makers that such a regime is needed and that the changes necessary to implement it should be made.
In order to thrive, pubs need to deliver what customers actually want. After carrying out market research, we have produced our Vision for Pubs. This identifies the key services that most pub-goers look for and which, therefore, we encourage pub owners to provide.
Currently, there is no legal definition of a pub. This creates particular problems in the planning arena where the boundaries between pubs, restaurants and hotels often become blurred. Given the added protection enjoyed by pubs, it is important that confusion is avoided and so we are campaigning for a legal definition to be introduced. In the meantime, we have produced our own pub definition (see CAMRA’s Definition of Pubs, Clubs, and other licensed premises).
We define a free house as a single licensed premises where the licensee is wholly and at all times free to purchase their stock of alcoholic beverages from whomsoever they choose without restriction, financial or otherwise.
We campaign for changes to the planning system that will give more protection to community pubs and, over the years, much progress has been made. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), first published in 2012, requires planning authorities to guard against the unnecessary loss of valued community facilities like pubs. In 2017, it became necessary, in England, to obtain planning permission for any change of use or demolition of a pub and we are now campaigning for the same levels of protection to be introduced by the devolved governments (in Scotland, change of use has long needed planning permission but demolition is still ‘permitted development’)
Local Authority Plans should recognise pubs as essential social and community amenities and should include protective policies to guard against their loss, and facilitate diversification to provide essential services, especially where the pub is the last remaining in the local community. Many Local Plans have been strengthened in recent years to bring them into line with the NPPF but much remains to be done.
We believe that planning law and planning policy should require all new large-scale developments to contain at least one pub and one shop.
We support the Agent of Change principle and the writing of it into all appropriate planning legislation and planning policies. This has now happened with the NPPF and means, for instance, that occupiers of new developments are limited in the extent to which they can complain about activities at pre-existing developments, like pubs.
We believe that all applications for the changes of pub names should be subject to planning permission
We support changes to the licensing system to reinforce the role of pubs as community facilities that supervise the responsible consumption of alcohol. This should be aimed at avoiding excessive consumption and seek to increase the proportion of alcohol consumed in a controlled environment.
Pubs should not be de-licensed until they have been offered for sale with licence for a reasonable period and at a reasonable price.
We believe accompanied children should be allowed in pubs provided suitable facilities are available. There should be no requirement in law that children should have to take a meal to use the premises, or to leave by a given time before the pub closes. The emphasis should be on the licensee’s decision whether to admit children, and the responsible adult's judgement whether the pub is suitable for the child.
Licensees should be free to open any hours that they choose. Licensing authorities acting on complaints should have powers to control the opening hours of premises causing proven public nuisance or disorder.
We oppose clustering late night licences aimed at young people: instead, the aim should be to spread late licences across all types of public houses in all parts of the licensing area. We campaign against the introduction of Late Night Levies by licensing authorities.